Sloat Restoration through Managed Retreat

Sloat Restoration through Managed Retreat
This is our original vision for Sloat Restoration - graphic courtesy of PSA and Associates and the Ocean Beach Task Force

Our Vision of Beach Restoration and Preservation

We advocate a managed retreat strategy to restore both Ocean Beach south of Sloat and Sharp Park. At Sloat, our vision involves:

A long-term plan to relocate threatened infrastructure
(including the south of Sloat Great Highway, the two oceanside parking lots and the sewer lines underneath them).

The cleanup of all the rock and rubble littering the beach.

The use of sand dunes as the primary tool to slow erosion.

For Sharp Park, we advocate the decommissioning of the golf course, the removal of the rip-rap berm, and a full restoration of the wetland.

Thursday, December 29, 2016

A Setback at Sharp Park / Good News for Sloat


SF Rec and Park is seeking to add more boulders to the Sharp Park seawall.
Photo: Emily V.



Greetings Surfriders,

We have a Sharp Park update:

Unfortunately SF Planning along with SF Rec. and Park voted 5-1 to certify the EIR that included the Sharp Park golf course redevelopment plan.  Although this was a major setback, we will have more opportunities to voice our concerns about the golf course renovation and what it implies for the beach. Sometime in January the SF Board of Supervisors are expected to meet to affirm this decision. We will notify all our activists when we have the dates.  In the meantime, you can write to your local SF Supervisor tp weigh in. To send an email, just type Supervisor's Firstname.Lastname@sfgov.org For example: Jane.Kim@sfgov.org. Please lend your voice in opposition to the golf course redevelopment project and its inclusion in the EIR.  We need folks to underscore the fact that the golf course EIR omitted the evaluation of the environmental impact of the seawall.  This is most troubling because there is an effort underway by SF Rec and Park to reinforce that structure.  Rec. and Park has an application currently in process with the Coastal Commission which will add more boulders to the seawall. See pic. above.

Sloat:

While we await the next stage of the LCP amendment process, we have received notice by SFPUC that the "Alternatives Analysis" phase for Sloat continues. This is the process of evaluating alternative ways to protect the Lake Merced Tunnel. The good news is that we have been assured that a Lake Merced Tunnel relocation and/or realignment strategy is one of the options being studied and weighed. We appreciate SFPUC's work on this behalf.  By keeping an open mind regarding our options for the LMT, we may ensure the best long term project gets built for Sloat.

Surfrider stands by its position that the uncertainties surrounding climate change should lead us to strive for maximum re-alignment of threatened structures.  If done correctly, the Ocean Beach Master Plan, SPUR, and the City of SF would have a showcase of innovation for climate change adaptation.  Currently, most coastal municipalities facing an erosion threat to development either harm their beaches through seawall construction and/or waste public funds trying to fill in the ocean with sand.  SF has the opportunity to show that there is a smarter alternative: managed retreat.  With managed retreat, we gain real long-term security for coastal development, preserve the public's beach and save taxpayer's millions of dollars by reducing our reliance on sand replenishment.

Thanks for checking in.  Happy New Year!

JOIN the Surfrider Foundation Today.

1 comment:

  1. This information is impressive; I am inspired with your post writing style & how continuously you describe this topic. After reading your post, thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel happy about it and I love learning more about this topic.. | Outsourcing land development services | Civil engineering services | Outsource Structural Drafting Services | Outsource CAD drafting services | hoa lan ho diep | civil engineering outsourcing | Civil engineering services

    ReplyDelete